Système d'information stratégique et agriculture (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields

Identifieur interne : 000342 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000341; suivant : 000343

Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields

Auteurs : Justin Van Wart [États-Unis] ; Patricio Grassini [États-Unis] ; Kenneth G. Cassman [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:EFD0B6D043D64A8FC33B12FEE8D01837946C2B08

Abstract

Crop simulation models can be used to estimate impact of current and future climates on crop yields and food security, but require long‐term historical daily weather data to obtain robust simulations. In many regions where crops are grown, daily weather data are not available. Alternatively, gridded weather databases (GWD) with complete terrestrial coverage are available, typically derived from: (i) global circulation computer models; (ii) interpolated weather station data; or (iii) remotely sensed surface data from satellites. The present study's objective is to evaluate capacity of GWDs to simulate crop yield potential (Yp) or water‐limited yield potential (Yw), which can serve as benchmarks to assess impact of climate change scenarios on crop productivity and land use change. Three GWDs (CRU, NCEP/DOE, and NASA POWER data) were evaluated for their ability to simulate Yp and Yw of rice in China, USA maize, and wheat in Germany. Simulations of Yp and Yw based on recorded daily data from well‐maintained weather stations were taken as the control weather data (CWD). Agreement between simulations of Yp or Yw based on CWD and those based on GWD was poor with the latter having strong bias and large root mean square errors (RMSEs) that were 26–72% of absolute mean yield across locations and years. In contrast, simulated Yp or Yw using observed daily weather data from stations in the NOAA database combined with solar radiation from the NASA‐POWER database were in much better agreement with Yp and Yw simulated with CWD (i.e. little bias and an RMSE of 12–19% of the absolute mean). We conclude that results from studies that rely on GWD to simulate agricultural productivity in current and future climates are highly uncertain. An alternative approach would impose a climate scenario on location‐specific observed daily weather databases combined with an appropriate upscaling method.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12302


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Wart, Justin" sort="Van Wart, Justin" uniqKey="Van Wart J" first="Justin" last="Van Wart">Justin Van Wart</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Grassini, Patricio" sort="Grassini, Patricio" uniqKey="Grassini P" first="Patricio" last="Grassini">Patricio Grassini</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cassman, Kenneth G" sort="Cassman, Kenneth G" uniqKey="Cassman K" first="Kenneth G." last="Cassman">Kenneth G. Cassman</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EFD0B6D043D64A8FC33B12FEE8D01837946C2B08</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12302</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EFD0B6D043D64A8FC33B12FEE8D01837946C2B08/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001440</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001440</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001342</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000035</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000035</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1354-1013:2013:Van Wart J:impact:of:derived</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000341</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000342</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000342</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Wart, Justin" sort="Van Wart, Justin" uniqKey="Van Wart J" first="Justin" last="Van Wart">Justin Van Wart</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska‐Lincoln, NE, 68583‐0915, Lincoln</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Lincoln</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Grassini, Patricio" sort="Grassini, Patricio" uniqKey="Grassini P" first="Patricio" last="Grassini">Patricio Grassini</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska‐Lincoln, NE, 68583‐0915, Lincoln</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Lincoln</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cassman, Kenneth G" sort="Cassman, Kenneth G" uniqKey="Cassman K" first="Kenneth G." last="Cassman">Kenneth G. Cassman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska‐Lincoln, NE, 68583‐0915, Lincoln</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Lincoln</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Global Change Biology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Glob Change Biol</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1354-1013</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2486</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2013-12">2013-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="3822">3822</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="3834">3834</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1354-1013</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">EFD0B6D043D64A8FC33B12FEE8D01837946C2B08</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12302</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">GCB12302</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1354-1013</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Crop simulation models can be used to estimate impact of current and future climates on crop yields and food security, but require long‐term historical daily weather data to obtain robust simulations. In many regions where crops are grown, daily weather data are not available. Alternatively, gridded weather databases (GWD) with complete terrestrial coverage are available, typically derived from: (i) global circulation computer models; (ii) interpolated weather station data; or (iii) remotely sensed surface data from satellites. The present study's objective is to evaluate capacity of GWDs to simulate crop yield potential (Yp) or water‐limited yield potential (Yw), which can serve as benchmarks to assess impact of climate change scenarios on crop productivity and land use change. Three GWDs (CRU, NCEP/DOE, and NASA POWER data) were evaluated for their ability to simulate Yp and Yw of rice in China, USA maize, and wheat in Germany. Simulations of Yp and Yw based on recorded daily data from well‐maintained weather stations were taken as the control weather data (CWD). Agreement between simulations of Yp or Yw based on CWD and those based on GWD was poor with the latter having strong bias and large root mean square errors (RMSEs) that were 26–72% of absolute mean yield across locations and years. In contrast, simulated Yp or Yw using observed daily weather data from stations in the NOAA database combined with solar radiation from the NASA‐POWER database were in much better agreement with Yp and Yw simulated with CWD (i.e. little bias and an RMSE of 12–19% of the absolute mean). We conclude that results from studies that rely on GWD to simulate agricultural productivity in current and future climates are highly uncertain. An alternative approach would impose a climate scenario on location‐specific observed daily weather databases combined with an appropriate upscaling method.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Van Wart, Justin" sort="Van Wart, Justin" uniqKey="Van Wart J" first="Justin" last="Van Wart">Justin Van Wart</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Cassman, Kenneth G" sort="Cassman, Kenneth G" uniqKey="Cassman K" first="Kenneth G." last="Cassman">Kenneth G. Cassman</name>
<name sortKey="Cassman, Kenneth G" sort="Cassman, Kenneth G" uniqKey="Cassman K" first="Kenneth G." last="Cassman">Kenneth G. Cassman</name>
<name sortKey="Grassini, Patricio" sort="Grassini, Patricio" uniqKey="Grassini P" first="Patricio" last="Grassini">Patricio Grassini</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000342 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000342 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Agronomie
   |area=    SisAgriV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:EFD0B6D043D64A8FC33B12FEE8D01837946C2B08
   |texte=   Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28.
Data generation: Wed Mar 29 00:06:34 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 12 12:44:16 2024